 |
| Dave Dombrowski will face plenty of questions this winter. | CREDIT: Susan Hellickson |
Bryce Harper stood inside the visitors' clubhouse at Truist Park Thursday night and offered perhaps the most revealing assessment of what comes next.
“I’d imagine this team is going to look a lot different next year,” Harper said.
Maybe it will.
The more important question is who gets to decide what different looks like.
Because after the Phillies' season ended with a 6-2 loss to Atlanta in Game 3 of the National League Wild Card Series, this is no longer merely an offseason about Alec Bohm, the bullpen or finding another bat.
It reaches higher than that.
To Don Mattingly.
And ultimately to Dave Dombrowski.
The Phillies have reached the point where an organization that has spent several winters attempting to preserve a championship window must decide whether preservation remains the right strategy.
They reached the World Series in 2022. They came within one victory of returning in 2023. Then came consecutive Division Series eliminations.
Now a Wild Card Series exit.
World Series.
NLCS.
NLDS.
NLDS.
Wild Card Series.
That isn't proof that everything Dombrowski built has failed. Quite the opposite. The Phillies have reached the postseason five consecutive years after going a decade without October baseball, and there remains enough high-end talent — particularly in the rotation — to believe another championship opportunity exists.
But the direction of those October results is impossible to ignore.
And that makes this winter different.
Dombrowski is under contract only through 2027, the final season of the three-year extension he received after the 2022 pennant. There has been no indication that John Middleton intends to replace him this winter. But the Phillies are approaching a decision point with the executive who constructed one of baseball's most expensive rosters.
Does Dombrowski receive another extension?
Does he enter 2027 without one?
And perhaps most importantly, how aggressively is he willing to alter a team whose largest commitments were made under his watch?
The first indication could come quickly.
Mattingly inherited a 9-19 team after Rob Thomson was fired and guided the Phillies to a 79-55 record from there, the fourth-best mark in baseball over that span. He did it despite an offense that ranked 19th in runs and a bullpen that posted a 4.43 ERA, 21st in the majors.
Players backed him afterward.
“We love Don,” Aaron Nola said.
Kyle Schwarber praised the steadiness Mattingly brought after Thomson's dismissal. J.T. Realmuto expressed his respect for him and his desire to see him return.
Mattingly wasn't lobbying Thursday.
“I'm comfortable with whatever they want to do,” he said. “I want the best for the Phillies.”
Less than a day later, however, his future already appeared to be taking shape. USA Today reported Friday that the Phillies plan to move on from Mattingly as manager while potentially offering him another role in the organization. The club had not officially announced such a move as of Friday afternoon.
If that happens, it becomes Dombrowski's first major statement about what comes next.
But changing managers cannot be the entire answer.
Neither can rebuilding another bullpen. Neither can replacing one veteran hitter with another and declaring the roster different.
The Phillies essentially tested that philosophy again in 2026, even if the organization resisted the suggestion that it had simply run things back.
There were changes.
Kyle Schwarber and J.T. Realmuto returned on new contracts. Cristopher Sánchez received a long-term extension. Luis Arraez arrived at the trade deadline. Justin Crawford and Andrew Painter became part of the major-league equation. Eventually, the manager changed, too.
Those weren't insignificant moves.
But the fundamental bet remained familiar: Harper, Trea Turner, Schwarber and the established veteran core would drive the offense, elite starting pitching would provide the foundation, and enough could be constructed around them to make another run through October.
The Phillies finished 88-74 and needed Game 162 to secure a postseason berth.
Three games later, it was over.
That doesn't mean the Phillies need to dismantle everything Dombrowski has built.
They shouldn't.
Sánchez is signed through 2032. Painter offers enormous upside. Harper and Schwarber remain central pieces. There is too much talent here — and too much starting pitching — to treat this like the beginning of a rebuild.
But there are openings for legitimate change.
Bohm is headed toward free agency. The Phillies can reconsider how their lineup is constructed. They can become younger and more athletic. They can stop treating the bullpen as something that must be reconstructed every offseason and again every July.
And they can ask harder questions about players and philosophies that previously seemed untouchable.
Because this winter shouldn't simply be about changing names.
It should be about determining what the Phillies have actually learned.
They have spent four years living off the promise created by 2022, convinced — with some justification — that another October breakthrough remained somewhere inside this group.
They gave that belief another chance in 2026.
It didn't happen.
So now comes the question that should define everything Dombrowski does next:
What have the Phillies learned from the last four Octobers?
Because if the answer is another bat, another reliever and another chance, then they haven't really answered anything.
Harper may be right that the Phillies will look considerably different next spring.
Now Dombrowski has to decide whether they will merely look different.
Or finally be different.
More Phillies Coverage
Loading Phillies schedule...
Loading NL East standings...
