Are we honoring bulk?
Are we honoring peak?
Are we honoring October?
Or are we honoring all the weird, wonderful ways a pitcher can define an era without ever feeling like a lock for Cooperstown?
That’s the Cole Hamels debate in a nutshell. On one hand, you have a left-hander who finished with 163 wins, 2,560 strikeouts, a 3.43 ERA and a 1.18 WHIP over 2,698 innings. On the other, you have a career that essentially hit a wall in his mid-30s because his body ran out of innings before his mind did.
But there’s one thing that isn’t up for debate: you cannot tell the story of 21st-century baseball — especially in Philadelphia — without Cole Hamels.
Start with 2008, because everyone does. Hamels was 24, the owner of a changeup that looked like it had its own passport, and the ace of a team trying to erase three decades of October baggage. That month, he made five postseason starts, went 4–0 with a 1.80 ERA, struck out 30 batters in 35 innings, and walked off with both NLCS and World Series MVP honors. That is not just a nice October. That is a franchise-altering October.
From there, zoom out. Between his debut in 2006 and his last effective season in 2018, Hamels was one of the steadiest frontline starters in the sport. His career line — 163–122, 3.43 ERA, 2,560 K — doesn’t come with an automatic ticket to Cooperstown, but context matters.
According to MLB’s own breakdown when he officially retired, Hamels is one of 46 pitchers to throw at least 2,000 innings since 2000, and his 123 ERA+ is tied for seventh-best in that group, behind names like Clayton Kershaw, Johan Santana, Max Scherzer, Justin Verlander, Roy Halladay and Roy Oswalt. If you’re seventh on a list that reads like that, you weren’t just “very good.” You were living in the neighborhood Hall of Fame voters keep wandering into.
Inside the Phillies’ universe, the résumé looks even more impressive. The club’s own historical review notes Hamels ranks third in franchise history in strikeouts, fourth in games started, and sixth in wins and innings pitched. He’s not just another name in the team record book. He’s in the same sections as Robin Roberts and Steve Carlton.
And then there’s the part of his file that feels like it belongs in a Stark column all by itself: his goodbye.
On July 25, 2015, with trade rumors swirling and his days in Philadelphia clearly numbered, Hamels went to Wrigley Field and threw a no-hitter against the Cubs — 13 strikeouts, 2 walks, no hits — in what turned out to be his final start as a Phillie before being traded to Texas. It was the first no-hitter against the Cubs since Sandy Koufax’s perfect game in 1965, and the last thing he ever did in a Phillies uniform was walk off the mound having allowed zero hits. That’s not just a neat closing scene. That’s a script.
So where’s the pushback?
It starts with volume. Hamels didn’t get to 200 wins, and in a world where CC Sabathia is going to the Hall with 251 victories and a far higher ERA, it’s easy for voters to look at 163 and shrug. His career postseason ERA is 3.41 — very good, but dragged up by a rough 2009 and late-career outings, which can make people forget how dominant he was at his peak. And the last few years of his career barely existed in the box scores at all; injuries allowed him just one start after 2019.
There’s also the changing standard. Starters simply aren’t piling up counting stats anymore. The Johan Santana lesson — dominance without longevity doesn’t seem to move enough voters — looms over Hamels, too. His case relies heavily on being consistently excellent for a dozen years, spectacular in one October, and central to the best run in modern Phillies history.
So how should we look at it?
If the Hall of Fame is still a museum about who defined an era, Hamels absolutely belongs in the conversation. He was the homegrown ace of a team that went to five straight postseasons from 2007–11, won two pennants and a World Series, and became the closest thing Philadelphia has had to a baseball dynasty in the modern age.
If the Hall is now mostly about outliers — inner-circle, no-doubt, “tell your grandchildren about this guy” talent — then Hamels probably ends up on the outside looking in. He feels like the archetype of a pitcher who lingers on the ballot, gets some support from stat-savvy voters, and eventually becomes a really interesting test case for some future era committee that’s more comfortable weighing ERA+, October, and context over raw totals.
But here’s the piece that sticks: when you add up everything he did — the October coronation in 2008, the years of rotation stability, the no-hitter in his farewell, the franchise leaderboard, the ERA+ standing among his contemporaries — it’s very hard to argue that he was just another good pitcher who happened to arrive at the right time.
He was part of why it was the right time.
In the end, that might be Cole Hamels’ strongest Hall of Fame argument: not just that he collected a compelling stack of numbers, but that, for a long stretch of baseball history, he felt like the kind of pitcher who should matter in Cooperstown conversations.
And if you can say that about a guy for 15 years, the case is very real, whether the plaque ever goes on the wall or not.
Loading Phillies schedule...
Loading NL East standings...
Support the Mission. Fuel the Movement.
You’re not just funding journalism — you’re backing the future of youth baseball in Philly.
👉 Join us on Patreon »